Examples include Buddhism, Jainism, and some forms of Hinduism. Several religious traditions, especially those originating in India, have promoted animal welfare as an important or fundamental concept, even to the point of promoting veganism. According to contemporary philosopher Nigel Warburton, for most of human history the dominant view has been that animals are there for humans to do with as they see fit. His notebooks also record his anger with the fact that humans used their dominance to raise animals for slaughter. Throughout history, some individuals, like Leonardo da Vinci for example, who once purchased caged birds in order to set them free, were concerned about cruelty to animals. Main articles: Animal welfare and Animal rights 2.11 Unnecessary scientific experiments or demonstrations.2.4 Alleged link to human violence and psychological disorders.They say that most animal use itself is unnecessary and a cause of suffering, so the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property and to ensure that they are never used as a substance or as a non-living thing.
Animal rights theorists criticize these positions, arguing that the words "unnecessary" and "humane" are subject to widely differing interpretations, and that animals have basic rights. Some utilitarians argue for a weaker approach which is closer to the animal welfare position, whereas others argue for a position that is similar to animal rights. Utilitarian advocates argue from the position of costs and benefits and vary in their conclusions as to the allowable treatment of animals. Others have argued that the definition of 'unnecessary' varies widely and could include virtually all current use of animals. Some think that the animal welfare position holds that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals for human purposes, such as food, clothing, entertainment, fun and research, but that it should be done in a way that minimizes unnecessary pain and suffering, sometimes referred to as "humane" treatment. There are a number of conceptual approaches to the issue of cruelty to animals. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for entertainment cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering as an end in itself, defined as zoosadism.ĭivergent approaches to laws concerning animal cruelty occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. White spots are shotgun pellets.Ĭruelty to animals, also called animal abuse, animal neglect or animal cruelty, is the infliction by omission (neglect) or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any animal.
0 kommentar(er)
